Ifeoma V. Dunu, Ezinne C. Abaneme


Online dating platforms are evolving cyber communication environments that has radicalised the traditional environment of meeting potential romantic partners and business partners. Online dating is an emerging area of discourse in the African scope; that calls for more inquiries in the how’s and why’s of this burgeoning new space. The dominant argument seems conflicting in relation to the perceived susceptibility to deception and other vices that seems prominent here. Yet in the African context within the context of conservative dominant dating traditions it seems to continue to blossom as an alternative and perhaps preferred ways especially among young people in search of a romantic partner.  It is based on this that we sought to examine why and how young females in Nigeria use online dating platforms, gratification gained from using it, and most dominant mode of communication. Using the survey method, we studied eight hundred and eighty nine (889) single women in the south Eastern part of Nigeria, within the age bracket of 18-40 years living in the state capitals of Imo, Anambra and Ebonyi. Two major Findings from the study resonate from literature. First, that majority of the respondents 66.4% are active users of online dating platform, who use it mostly on daily basis. Second, multiple response answer (MRA), findings show that the most gratified need desired by the respondents is emotional needs (36.4%). Literature has shown that users of online dating sites use the platform for socialization and meeting romantic partners. This study corroborates existing argument that suggests that despite some of its dysfunctional functions, anonymity, and a quick and easy access to dating tradition that breaks the barrier of physicality including age and technological advancements contributes to it continued success. This could be linked to the anecdotal evidence that some users have successfully dated and married partners that they met on online dating sites. This therefore aligns with literature that online dating is now an acceptable way for dating, as the African society have also keyed into this new trend. 


cyber communication, cyber dating, online dating sites, single women, Nigeria

Full Text:



Aaron, A. (2012). Online dating: a critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science, Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 13(1), 1-2.

African Launch Pad (2020), Top 10 best dating sites in Nigeria 2020: some are for free. Retrieved from

Alam, S.S., Islam, M.R., Mokhbul, Z.K.M. and Makmor, B.N. (2018). Factors affecting intention to use online dating sites in Malysia. International journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4.28) 192-198

Anderson, M., Vogels, E. A., & Turner, E. (2020, February 6). The virtues and downsides of online dating. Pew Research Center.

Arnett, J.J., 2000. Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am. Psychol. 55 (5), 469.

Baran, S. J. (2009).Introduction to mass communication: Media literacy and culture, (5th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Bartsch, A. (2012). Emotional Gratification in Entertainment Experience. Why Viewers of Movies and Television Series Find it Rewarding to Experience Emotions. Media Psychology, 15(3), 267–302. doi:10.1080/15213269.2012.693811

Businesstopia (2018). “Uses and Gratifications Theory.”

Casimiro, C. (2014). “Portuguese online dating: exploring gender differences in self-presentations”, RevistaTeknokultura, Vol. 11 Núm. 1: 117-141.

Cornwell, B., & Lundgren, D. C. (2001). Love on the Internet: Involvement and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs. realspace. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2), 197–211.

Corriero, E. F., & Tong, S. T. (2015). Managing uncertainty in mobile dating applications: Goals, concerns of use, and information seeking in Grindr. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 121–141. doi:10.1177/2050157915614872

Couch, D. and Liamputtong, P. (2008). “Online dating and mating: the use of the internet to meet sexual partners.” Qualitative Health Research 18: 268–279.

Dinh, R., Gildersleve, P., Blex, C. and Yasseri, T. (2018), Computational courtship: understanding the evolution of online dating through large scale data analysis. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Ezumah, N. N. (2000). Perceptions of sexuality and gender relations among the Igbo and implications for the reproductive health of men and women: Selected findings from Awka and Agulu, Anambra State, Nigeria. In E. Salo& H. Moffet (Eds.), Associate publication (pp. 30-62). Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town.

Farkas, C., 2010. ‘‘Tons of useful stuff”: defining wellness in popular magazines. Stud. Pop. Cult. 33 (1), 113–132

Finkel, E. J.; Eastwick, P. W.; Karney, B. R. and Reis, H. T.; Sprecher, S. (2012). Online Dating: A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66. doi:10.1177/1529100612436522

Foddy, W. (1993): Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires: Theory and Practice in Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books. 1707–1723.k

Gudelunas, D. (2012). There’s an app for that: The uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Society and Culture, 16(4). 347-365. DOI:10.1007/s12119–012– 9127–4

Hancock, J. T. &Toma, C.L. (2009). Putting your best face forward: the accuracy of online dating photographs. Journal of Communication. 59 (2): 367–386. Doi:10.1111/J.1460-2466.2009.01420.X.

Hart, M. (2015). Youth Intimacy on Tumblr. YOUNG, 23(3), 193–208. doi:10.1177/1103308815577878

Izang, A.A., Kasali, F.A., Ajayi, W.S., and Abegbenjo, A. (2016). The role of social media on online dating and sustainable marriage. Inernational journal of multidiciplinary Sciences and Engineering, Vol 7 (7)

James, J. (2015, May). Mobile dating in the digital age: Computer mediated communication and relationship building on tinder. Retrieved from

Justin R. Garcia, Susan M. Seibold-Simpson, Sean G. Massey & Ann M. Merriwether (2015) Casual Sex: Integrating Social, Behavioral, and Sexual Health Research Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Katz, E. Blumler, J., and Gurevitch, M. (1974).Uses and gratifications research.The Public Opinion Quarterly, 4, 509-523.

Katz, E. (1959). Mass communication research and the study of culture. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1–6.

Katz, E., Haas, H.and Gurevitch, M. (1973). "On the use of the mass media for important things". American Sociological Review. 38 (2): 164–181. doi:10.2307/2094393. JSTOR 2094393.

Kennedy, B. (2010, September 22). A history of the digital self: The evolution of online dating. Psychology Today. Retrieved May 20, 2016, from

Lawson, H. M., and Leck, K. (2006).Dynamics of internet dating.Social Science Computer Review,24(2), 189-208. doi:10.1177/0894439305283402

Ligtenberg, L. (2015). Tinder, the app that is setting the dating scene on fire: A uses and gratifications perspective. Retrieved from

Lingard, H. C, and Rowlinson, S. (2006). Sample size in factor analysis: Why size matters.

McIntyre, L. J. (1999). The practical skeptic: Core concepts in sociology. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.

Mckenna, K. Y. A. and Bargh, J .A (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: the implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review; 457–75.

NOII POLL (2016) Perception of Nigerians on Social Media Usage and Online Dating in Nigeria, poll report (Feb. 2016)

Ntoimo, L. F. C., &Isiugo-Abanihe, U. (2013). Patriarchy and Singlehood Among Women in Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Family Issues, 35(14), 1980–2008. doi:10.1177/0192513x13511249

Orchard, T. (2019). Online dating sites. Digital Sexuality and Memoir.

Orlando, A. (2021). 10 Benefits of Online Dating. Retrieved from

Ortega, J., and Hergovich, P. (2017). The Strength of Absent Ties: Social Integration via Online Dating. Retrieved from

Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2007). Who looks for casual dates on the Internet? A test of the compensation and the recreation hypotheses. New Media & Society, 9, 455-74.

Poley, M.E.M (2011), Who uses online dating: the role of personality in college students' use of the internet to find a partner. A Thesis,University of North Carolina

Ranzini, G.; Lutz, C. Love at first swipe? Explaining Tinder self-presentation and motives. Mob.Media Commun. 2017, 5, 80–101. [CrossRef]

Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., Cummings, C., & Felt, J. (2008). The impact of emotionality and self-disclosure on online dating versus traditional dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2124–2157.

Shraddha, B. (2018) "Uses and Gratifications Theory," in Businesstopia, January 11, 2018,

Stack, D. W. & Hocking, J. E. (1999). Communication research. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.

Statista (2021). Most popular dating apps worldwide as of May 2021, by number of monthly downloads. Retrieved from

Stone, A. R. (1996). The War of Desire and Technology at the Close of the Mechanical Age.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Su, X., and Hu. H. (2019), Gender-specific preference in online dating. EPJ Data Science 8: 12.

Sumter, S. R., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). Perceptions of love across the lifespan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(5), 417–427. doi:10.1177/0165025413492486

Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 67–78. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009

Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., and Ligtenberg, L. (2016). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics And Informatics, 34(1). 67-78. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009

Taylor, D., and Altman, I. (1987). Communication in interpersonal relationships: Social penetration processes. In M. E.Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal Processes: New Directions in Communication Research (pp. 257 – 277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Timmermans, E.; De Caluwé, E. To Tinder or not to Tinder, that’s the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2017, 110, 74–79. [CrossRef]

Toma, C. L. and Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and lies: the role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37(3), 335-351. Doi:10.1177/0093650209356437..

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Who Visits Online Dating Sites? Exploring Some Characteristics of Online Daters. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(6), 849–852. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9941

Van De Wiele, C., & Tong, S. T. (2014). Breaking boundaries. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp ’14 Adjunct. doi:10.1145/2632048.2636070

Walther, J. B., Slovacek, C. L. and Tidwell, L. C. (2001). “Is a picture worth a thousand words? photographic images in long-term and short-term computer-mediated communication”. Communication Research. 28 (1), 105-134.

Wang, C.and Chang, Y. (2010). "Cyber relationship motives: scale development and validation". Social Behaviour and Personality. 38 (3): 289–300. Doi:10.2224/Sbp.2010.38.3.289.

Whitty, M. T., and Carr, A. (2006). Cyberspace romance: The psychology of online relationships. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan


  • There are currently no refbacks.





ISSN (Print): 2276-8645





Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.